Fund great ideas wherever they are
So, about geographic funding restrictions: a few weeks ago, @Haroon Yasin from @Taleemabad dropped by our office. He’s a stellar operator in Pakistan with a scalable solution to a big problem. But he keeps hearing funders say, “Sorry, we don’t fund in Pakistan.”
We understand why funders often choose to restrict their funding to a relatively few geographies. Here are some reasons to reconsider:
If we want to create change at scale, we need to find and fund the best. The way to get everyone served is to find the solutions that can scale up. Mulago will go wherever there's a great idea that might change the lives of the poor.
Pakistan is a good example. It's geopolitically vital to all of our interests, there are great opportunities, it needs attention more than India and nobody funds there. For no good reason.
Neither we nor other small-to-mid size funders (or even bigger ones, really) are single-handedly going to “fix” any region, so it's not clear to me why it makes sense to restrict our range.
When funders limit scope, they often settle for what’s there rather than what’s best. That’s not how you drive impact.
You might think you’re a better funder because you “know” a country. It’s the doer who needs to know the place—your job is to make sure they do. I know a good idea and operator when I see one, but what do I really know about anywhere other than maybe California? When visiting places, I've always found it safest to assume vast ignorance. I do what I'm told.
Some of our wisest colleagues have staff from and situated in countries they fund in, like Kenya, and of course they know infinitely more about those locales than I ever could. But even then—the world is a big place, and I'm always struck by regional differences.
Here's the safest approach:
Wherever they are.
The best stuff we run into, straight to your inbox. Zero spam, promise. To see past issues, click here.